Public transport compo: what is the threshold?

If you’re confused about tram and train compensation thresholds, you’re not the only one.

PTV announced earlier this month that:

PTV CEO Jeroen Weimar said both Metro and Yarra Trams narrowly missed their new targets for punctuality in February, but met their targets for reliability.

PTV’s web site has figures for February 2018 that clearly show that of the three major operators — Metro, Yarra Trams and V/Line — all failed to meet their punctuality targets:

PTV: February 2018 performance

As shown in this Transport For Victoria info graphic, the performance targets changed in the new contract.

The target we’re interested in right now, punctuality, went up to 92% for Metro, and 82% for Yarra Trams:

Transport For Victoria: new performance targets from December 2017

Trams in Flinders Street

What about the compo?

Okay, so if Metro and Yarra Trams missed their targets, can you claim compensation?

It turns out no, you can’t. If you go looking on the Metro or Yarra Trams web sites, nowhere does it mention that compensation is payable for February.

Why is this? I sought clarification from PTV.

It turns out the target is different to the compensation threshold.

Punctuality:

Punctuality target Compensation threshold February 2018
Metro 92.0% 90.0% 91.8%
Yarra Trams 82.0% 79.0% 81.7%
V/Line 92.0% 92.0% 82.7%

(Previous punctuality thresholds: Metro 88%, Yarra Trams 77%)

Reliability:

Reliability target Compensation threshold February 2018
Metro 98.5% 98.0% 98.8%
Yarra Trams 98.5% 98.0% 98.7%
V/Line 96.0% 96.0% 96.3%

(Previous reliability thresholds: Metro 98%, Yarra Trams 98%, eg unchanged)

So as you can see, Metro and Yarra Trams beat the reliability and punctuality thresholds, even if they didn’t quite meet the punctuality targets. (Only V/Line is paying compensation for February.)

It’s also apparently the thresholds, not the targets, that trigger financial penalties.

So in this case, even though Metro and Yarra Trams missed their punctuality targets… the only consequence appears to have been a light public berating by PTV.

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment. You can subscribe via feed reader RSS, or subscribe by email. You can also Follow me on Twitter, or Like the blog on Facebook.

10 Replies to “Public transport compo: what is the threshold?”

  1. Daniel
    sounds like a deliberately opaque and dodgy compo scheme.
    Thanks for exposing this.
    In any case, only “eligible” commuters can get compensation anyway and the rules around this are quite onerous too (in the last ten years I’ve never been eligible despite travelling by train every weekday)

  2. Obviously a “secret” clause in the new contracts. The headline was that the government was imposing tougher requirements on the operators, but the “real” thresholds were not publicised at all. Essentially, the “targets” are not targets at all, just aspirations.

  3. So hold on, what your table indicates is that V/Line fell short of its punctuality target and below its compensation threshold. Is this an error, or can i actually claim compensation?

  4. May as well set the “Targets” all to 100%, it seems they are useless.

    All services should have a target to be 100% punctual and reliable.

  5. Some great information here Daniel.

    I use the 901 bus quite often, either as my alternative trip home if there are issues on the Frankston line then I can travel to Dandenong (as long as those train lines are running) then catch the 901 towards Frankston (and reverse that if traveling into the city); or my frequent trips to Dandenong market.

  6. There’s a difference between compensation and penalties to the operator.

    Not hitting the performance targets will still hurt the operators, either due to not receiving the performance bonus or receiving an abatement.

    Compensation is an additional penalty on top of this, but not the only penalty. It’s incorrect to say this doesn’t impact the operators.

  7. Thanks for the clarification Marcus. Now that you mention it, I do remember that being mentioned back when the new contracts were announced.

  8. Sorry, I’ll correct myself, I meant that the call-in thresholds existed in the previous franchise, not targets, and they didn’t have any relation to the public stats or OPR (now e-OPR) or the passenger compensation thresholds (which obviously also existed in MR3), like the targets don’t now.

    and I meant page 3 in the document numbering, 17 in the PDF.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.