Most striking was that there were zebra crossings. Lots and lots of zebra crossings.
When I first spotted how many there were, I wasn’t totally sure what I was seeing, and actually warned my fellow travellers to watch and observe the locals, just in case the road markings didn’t mean what they mean in Australia. Did vehicles really have to stop for pedestrians at all these locations?
Yes. The stripes mean the same thing (except if there are traffic lights). There are just lots of zebra crossings.
Zebra crossings on main streets, zebra crossings on minor streets, zebra crossings on divided roads with trams in the middle, zebra crossings at intersections and mid-block.
Lots and lots of zebra crossings, and drivers observed them – perhaps because they’re so used to them.
Roundabouts? Not a problem. In Australia, these are virtually the only locations where vehicles in any direction don’t have to give way. Exceptions are rare. The Belgian roundabouts I saw had zebra crossings on all sides:
Two T-junctions so close together that putting zebra crossings on every side would mean three in row? Sure, go ahead. The motorists will survive:
Generally, motor vehicles had to give way to pedestrians, but pedestrians had to give way to trams.
How much does having lots of zebra crossings affect traffic? It’s hard to say, but the cars driving around didn’t seem to be unduly held up. When I saw peak hour traffic set in, it was clear that – as anywhere else – the main thing delaying cars was other cars.
Some wider streets had traffic lights with pedestrian crossings. At many of these, you didn’t have to press a “beg” button – there was no button. The green man triggered automatically:
This not only tells pedestrians approaching that they don’t have to press a button to cross. It also indicates the authorities have no intention of changing it (and necessitating having a button) any time soon.
This of course is how it should be. If you’re giving the green to vehicles, why wouldn’t you also give the green to pedestrians? (More about this in another
rant post soon.)
Note the signalised crossings have the same on-road markings as zebra crossings. I wonder if that helps with compliance? They’re much more obvious than the Australian dashed line markings.
At a few spots I saw, buttons were necessary to trigger the green man. These seemed to be reasonably responsive, not making you wait too long:
In some locations, presumably those that get very busy at times, the crossings were very wide.
Along with mostly wide footpaths (at least, wide enough to cope with pedestrian traffic), the design of the crossings left one with the impression that Belgian authorities would prefer you walked than drive.
It’s the sort of thing that some might not even notice, but it left an impression on me. If only Australian authorities were so inspired.
Could we do this in Australia?
Sure. But while some new zebra crossings have popped up over the last few years, they don’t seem to be routinely installed.
This spot outside Gardiner Station clearly should have been a zebra crossing:
And don't forget this gem down the street – FOUR signs just in case you forget who has priority after you cross over the tracks. pic.twitter.com/hNWaJIhbpS
— Alexa Delbosc (@AlexaDelbosc) September 12, 2017
This was almost a zebra crossing, but someone messed up. (I shouldn’t have opened my big mouth. It’s now entirely a signalised crossing… which thanks to the beg button, many people ignore):
— Daniel Bowen (@danielbowen) May 18, 2014
This is the newish tram stop on Collins Street at William Street. It could have had zebra crossings at the non-intersection end. But someone decided a signalised crossing was a better idea. It’s maddeningly slow to wait for if you’re crossing, and many people just cross whenever there’s a gap in the traffic:
I would think there’s also scope to place zebra crossings on side streets at intersections, particularly in suburban shopping centres.
The law says a vehicle turning into the street gives way, but convention is often the opposite, with vehicles exiting the street often giving way instead.
And pedestrians sometimes wave stopped motorists on, when the motorist is doing the right thing and giving way. (Do me a favour: if you’re crossing and other people are too, don’t wave the car on. You might not be in any great hurry to get where you’re going, but you don’t speak for everybody else.)
Painting zebra crossings right across the side street would not just encourage walking, it would also help reduce the confusion over who’s meant to give way to whom, in what are typically high traffic (pedestrian and vehicle) areas.
Ditto car park entrances, where motorists entering and exiting are meant to give way to pedestrians.
More zebra crossings are perfectly possible. Here’s what they’ve done in Footscray. It was quiet when I took this photo, but often there are lots of pedestrians around. Somehow, the traffic still gets through:
Potentially two-lane main roads like Centre Road and McKinnon Road could have zebra crossings too. That would be bringing it up to Belgian standards, and would be in line with the Vicroads Smartroads strategy which says it’s meant to prioritise pedestrians and buses. What would be the effect on traffic? It would be interesting to see it modelled.
Ultimately, if we prefer people walk where possible, more needs to be done to encourage it.