Angels and Demons
Dan Brown: Angels and Demons. (Disclaimer: I was forced to read this.) The good: after a plodding start, the plot did get interesting, and exciting enough that I wanted to keep reading and find out what happened. Nice twist at the end.
The bad: Wooden, two-dimensional characters. Romantic scenes written like Mills and Boon. Spelling out every plot development 2-3 times so nobody will miss anything. Sloppily written (either refer to the Swiss Guard as one body, or the Swiss Guards as a group of individuals, but don’t swap between the two, especially in one paragraph).
For fiction to be believable, it has to have a basis in truth, and this fell down on basic facts (such as the BBC telephone operator smoking at her desk, and people continually commenting that their cell phones didn’t have a dial tone — dial tone???), which destroyed the fantasy and left me wondering how much else of it was wrong.
All in all, a mostly enjoyable read. But there are many much better-written books out there.
Life is short. Read good books. Thumbs down to Brown.
Tags:
Comments
4 comments on Angels and Demons
-
flerdle on
Tue, 20th Dec 2005 11:45 pm
-
flerdle on
Tue, 20th Dec 2005 11:53 pm
-
wish-ga on
Wed, 21st Dec 2005 3:27 pm
-
Dino on
Wed, 21st Dec 2005 4:18 pm
Hear, hear. And whatever you do, avoid Digital Fortress like the plague.
(I know I said it before, but now you know WHY I said it before :-) )
Thanks Daniel, for takin’ one for the team. Now I feel I don’t have to read it. What a relief!
Personally, I enjoyed The DaVinci Code. YMMV.
